Mini Content Marketing comparison of websites for securityfocus.com

securityfocus.com

65%

whois.com

51%
Change competitor

exploit-db.com

39%
Change competitor

cvedetails.com

36%
Change competitor

seclists.org

32%
Change competitor

Our algorithms collect information, determine the relevant competitors and compare how these pages perform in direct comparison in fields: search engine rankings and traffic, social media activity and reach, popularity on other websites (backlinks) and the technical aspects of the website itself (user experience and many more). The selection of competitors can be improved by any visitor at any time by clicking on them and selecting an additional one or replacing existing ones. The displayed score is made up of metrics, which we present below. It shows percentage success measurement (snapshot) compared to the competition. The higher the percentage, the better performance. This area belongs to the research work of the Internet Institute Zurich and does not guarantee the accuracy of the data. For precise evaluations, we recommend opening an account.

Submit better competitors

SEO: Number of expected visitors from the search engine

Expected volume of visitors based on the visibility in the search engine (presence on the first search results page for keywords that have significant monthly demand. Calculated thanks to public statistics on click rate). The value should not be compared with Google analytics numbers. The key figures are intended to be representative for the search engine visibility of a domain.

Social media statistics

Selected social media statistics on reach (number of followers / fans), activity (number of posts) and engagement (e.g. number of likes achieved for all posts).

This area belongs to the research work of the Internet Institute Zurich and does not guarantee the accuracy of the data. For precise evaluations, we recommend opening an account.

Metric securityfocus.com cvedetails.com exploit-db.com whois.com seclists.org
Twitter followers x x x x x
Twitter following (account is following) x x x x x
Twitter likes x x x x x
Instagram followers x x x x x
Instagram following (account is following) x x x x x
Youtube subscribers x x x x x
Youtube comments x x x x x
Youtube videos x x x x x

Number of referring external websites - an important source of visitors

Number of backlinks and other important metrics

Metric securityfocus.com cvedetails.com exploit-db.com whois.com seclists.org
Number of Referring Backlinks (Content Popularity) (day) 12,566,724 1,227,480 1,488,394 3,693,965 884,947
Number of Referring Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 85,913 6,367 9,761 10,100 10,845
Number of URLs found in the index (day) 815,586 2,430,992 440,176 125,433 516,957
Number of IPs that refer to domain (day) 49,841 5,336 7,940 7,465 8,889
Number of subnets that refer to domain (day) 33,076 4,366 6,183 5,897 7,185
Number of Referring .EDU und .EDU - related Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 625 44 86 35 102
Number of Backlinks from .EDU and .EDU - related Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 16,230 1,650 1,211 13,076 12,344
Number of governmental and .gov - related domains that refer to domain (day) 94 12 17 4 28
Number of government and .gov - related external backlinks that link to domain (day) 46,215 58 5,004 32 2,907
The exact number of educational domains that refer to domain (day) 293 26 41 17 58
Number of Backlinks from .EDU Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 8,275 109 142 147 682
The exact number of government domains that refer to domain (day) 15 4 5 1 6
The exact number of government links that refer to domain (day) 45,376 7 4,967 1 2,773
Average number of outgoing links to unique domains for that domain (day) 0 5 7 0 3
The number of outgoing links for this domain (day) 1 19 22 0 17
Average number of internal links for domain (day) 6 68 37 210 17
Link Strength of Referring Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 74 48 56 49 50
Authority of Referring Domains (Content Popularity) (day) 73 28 34 28 51
TrustMetric value for domain (day) - Majestic metric 73 28 34 28 51

Keywords research

Frequent words and word combinations of the group of chosen websites and statistics on the occurrence and monthly demand in Google. Find keywords that are often used by competitors and have demand in the search engine.

Usability scores

User Experience Performance of the main domain on various devices (100 - is the best performance) und information about website loading times.

Page title
SecurityFocus
Desktop speed score 82
Mobile speed score 68
Mobile usability score 60
Number of all page resources 11
Number of static page resources 8
Number of JS page resources 2
Number of styles (CSS) page resources 1
Total request weight 1 kb
HTML response weight 12 kb
CSS response weight 29 kb
Images response weight 46 kb
JS response weight 22 kb

Usability - optimization suggestions

Selected advices to optimize loading times.

Cache (desktop) by setting expiry date for
https://www.securityfocus.com/__utm.js
https://www.securityfocus.com/images/site/dash.gif
https://www.securityfocus.com/images/site/header_button_bar.gif
Cache (mobile) by setting expiry date for
https://www.securityfocus.com/__utm.js
https://www.securityfocus.com/images/site/dash.gif
https://www.securityfocus.com/images/site/header_button_bar.gif
Minify your CSS files (desktop)
https://www.securityfocus.com/new_SFPS_style.css - 6.9KiB (24%)
Minify your CSS files (mobile)
https://www.securityfocus.com/new_SFPS_style.css - 6.9KiB (24%)
Minify HTML files (desktop)
https://www.securityfocus.com/ - 3.4KiB (30%)
Minify HTML files (mobile)
https://www.securityfocus.com/ - 3.4KiB (30%)
Minify JavaScript files (desktop)
https://www.securityfocus.com/__utm.js - 2.9KiB (19%)
https://www.securityfocus.com/js/standard.js - 1.3KiB (26%)
Minify JavaScript files (mobile)
https://www.securityfocus.com/__utm.js - 2.9KiB (19%)
https://www.securityfocus.com/js/standard.js - 1.3KiB (26%)
Optimize image files (desktop)
https://www.securityfocus.com/images/site/sf-symc-connect-banner.jpg - 20.2KiB (50%)
https://www.securityfocus.com/images/site/sf_new.gif - 915B (23%)
Some texts on your page renders in a way that may be difficult for some of your visitors to read. (mobile)
Configure a viewport for mobile page, ex.
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
Some of the links/buttons on your webpage may be too small for a user to easily tap on a touchscreen. (mobile)

Summary of some information about this domain and its competition

Main

  • Die Domain achieved a Score of 2238.
  • The competing domain whois.com has achieved a score of 1730

Content

  • 157 words or phrases (two word combinations) were found on the main domain.
  • The ratio of the number of words and word combinations on the main domains to the benchmark of the competition sites is "157:173".
  • The term that appears on all competitors websites, but not on the website of the main domain, is with.
  • The competitor exploit-db.com has achieved a value of 1211 for the metric: "Number of backlinks from .EDU and .EDU-like domains (daily value)".
  • The competitor seclists.org has achieved a value of 51 for the metric: "Trust metric - Majestic metric".

Social media

  • The domain exploit-db.com has a Twitter account.
  • A link to the Linkedin was found on the domain seclists.org.
  • 40% of this group of domains has a Facebook account.
  • 0% of this group of domains has a Youtube account.
  • The number of Twitter tweets belonging to the competitor whois.com tweet account is 106 (since the last update).

Seo

  • The URL https://www.whois.com/whois/ is the most frequent url in our search engine rankings, which belongs to the competitor whois.com
  • This free report has been updated for the competitor exploit-db.com on 2020-01-24.
  • In the search engine rankings below, the average position for the competitor whois.com is: 60.
  • The average position in the search engine rankings for the main domain is 53.
  • The number of visitors from the search engine to the main domain is 0 per month.

Server

  • The CSS of the competitor whois.com website accounts for9% of all data transfers.
  • The competitor cvedetails.com website could compress the JS file https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.12.4.js and save 43.9KiB kb (51%).
  • It would be an advantage to compress the image at the competitor cvedetails.com website: http://www.cvedetails.com/img/cvss-9.png in order to 888B kb.
  • The compression of the HTML together with INLINE CSS and JS enables the main domain website to save 3.4KiB kb each time the page is loaded.
  • 8 CSS/JSS static elements can be found on the website of the main domain.